finite cardinal造句
例句與造句
- Natural numbers can be considered either as finite ordinals or finite cardinals.
- For finite cardinals, this definition coincides with the standard definition of the binomial coefficient.
- Here consider them as finite cardinal numbers.
- It can also be seen directly to be regular, as the cardinal sum of a finite number of finite cardinal numbers is itself finite.
- Or more loosely but more intuitively, " n " is an integer iff at least one of the numbers " n " and " " n " is a natural number / a finite cardinal / a finite ordinal.
- It's difficult to find finite cardinal in a sentence. 用finite cardinal造句挺難的
- Below are some examples . ( Note : some authors, arguing that " there are no finite cardinal numbers in general topology ", prefer to define the cardinal functions listed below so that they never take on finite cardinal numbers as values; this requires modifying some of the definitions given below, e . g . by adding " \; \; + \; \ aleph _ 0 " to the right-hand side of the definitions, etc .)
- Below are some examples . ( Note : some authors, arguing that " there are no finite cardinal numbers in general topology ", prefer to define the cardinal functions listed below so that they never take on finite cardinal numbers as values; this requires modifying some of the definitions given below, e . g . by adding " \; \; + \; \ aleph _ 0 " to the right-hand side of the definitions, etc .)
- Below are some examples . ( Note : some authors, arguing that " there are no finite cardinal numbers in general topology ", prefer to define the cardinal functions listed below so that they never taken on finite cardinal numbers as values; this requires modifying some of the definitions given below, e . g . by adding " \; \; + \; \ aleph _ 0 " to the right-hand side of the definitions, etc .)
- Below are some examples . ( Note : some authors, arguing that " there are no finite cardinal numbers in general topology ", prefer to define the cardinal functions listed below so that they never taken on finite cardinal numbers as values; this requires modifying some of the definitions given below, e . g . by adding " \; \; + \; \ aleph _ 0 " to the right-hand side of the definitions, etc .)
- If the axiom of choice holds, every cardinal ? has a successor ? + > ?, and there are no cardinals between ? and its successor . ( Without the axiom of choice, using Hartogs'theorem, it can be shown that, for any cardinal number ?, there is a minimal cardinal ? +, so that + ? ? .-- > \ kappa ^ + \ nleq \ kappa . ) For finite cardinals, the successor is simply ? + 1.